Exercices de LLCER Anglais : Dossier et grand oral

Dans le cadre de l'enseignement de LLCER Anglais, vous travaillez sur l'axe $Art and Power$. Votre sujet porte sur le rôle du street art dans les manifestations sociales à Londres. Votre problématique actuelle est : $How does street art change society?$. Le jury du Grand Oral attend une problématique plus précise et liée au programme. Proposez une version améliorée en utilisant des connecteurs logiques de contraste.

You are preparing your Grand Oral for the LLCER Anglais speciality. Your chosen theme is 'Arts and Debates of Ideas'. You have selected a speech by Malala Yousafzai (2014) and a painting by Norman Rockwell. Your objective is to articulate how these two documents allow you to address the problem statement: 'How can personal expression serve as a tool for social and political change?'. In a short paragraph, explain the link between these two documents using appropriate transition markers. Ensure your argument length represents roughly $15\%$ of your total speech time, which is set at $10$ minutes.

In the context of your Grand Oral preparation, analyze the following argumentative claim: 'If we sacrifice our privacy for convenience, are we not trading our democratic freedom for a digital illusion, much like a prisoner who forgets the shape of the key that locks his own cell?' Identify three distinct rhetorical devices present in this sentence. Furthermore, construct a logical argument defending the claim that the loss of privacy ($P$) leads to the erosion of autonomy ($Q$), expressed as the implication $P \implies Q$. How does this logical structure reinforce your spoken argument when addressing the jury?